CNN’s Ben Wedeman gets a look at US weaponry on the front lines of Ukraine’s fight against Russia. #CNN #News.
source
Watch Ukrainian troops fire US-supplied M777 Howitzers on Russian positions

CNN’s Ben Wedeman gets a look at US weaponry on the front lines of Ukraine’s fight against Russia. #CNN #News.
source
Those are long range with c4 12500 km right? Those shells weight over 25lbs? My 155mms in the shed only hold 6lbs of c4.
Can I buy 3 m777
It is almost NOV 2022 & UA is still firing the M777 but with GPS tracking Excalibur artillery rounds for extreme precision.
The tide is turning & Ivan is on the run!
Russian forces eliminate US missile launcher Harpoon in Odessa region
Furthermore
the Aerospace Force hit an ammunition depot of Ukrainian troops in Soledar, Republic of Donetsk, with the attack resulting in the annihilation of up to 40 nationalists and 19 armored vehicles.
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK UKRAINE
in Ukraine in 2014, the Nazis seized power with an armed coup. STOP LYING !
As scriptures records, ' Curse is upon anyone who rely on human help" ( Jeremiah 17: 5). Moreover, these kinds of guns or weapon cannot win this war, as alleged, or at all. Russians can easily target and dismantle them using precision drones- as they have been doing.
The Ukrainian troops are just buying time! Delaying the inevitable of the slowly but surely Russians onslaught special operation in Ukraine k! Long dragging war of attrition the likeness of World War 1 wherein you put everything what you got to the enemy and between you is No Mans or Dogs land only Rats land! K
Go Russia
PUTIN IS THE BEST.
MEMANG TOP BANGET
What Ukraine really needs are non-nuclear, long-range missiles that can reach major cities and strategic targets well inside Russia; then Putin and the fascists that support him can find out how it feels to have hell visit them in their own backyards. Let's level the playing field a little and stop with the half-measures. Poor Ukraine has to fight with one hand tied!
Thank GOD there's idiots out there who want to bother US friends. We sell them the old stuff, then try out the new stuff and watch our enemies eat it
The United States will never stand alone in a war or a war with Russia. Which is currently 100% proven true. That is why Russia is keeping NATO together. The United States of America has been a tiger on paper for so long, but now it has turned into a fox for fear of Russia. No matter how much the Western world propagates, their power is nothing but Russia's. All the countries in the world today believe that Russia is the only country that can defeat NATO. Moreover, if China, Iran, Turkey, India and North Korea form military alliances with Russia, then their combined power will turn into a NATO rat.
Зеленскому обещали прислать мацалет и мацастрел.
Stamp out Soviet communism!
Then penalties we will have when we help more and more
PUTIN &THE MAD DOGS OF MAN 2022 ??
Wherever dwell the mad dogs of man
There is corruption, plunder and hate.
In every city, town or village
Those who promote distrust deserve their fate.
All are born as an innocent child
Till misled by others along the way.
God has always loved His children
Though it breaks His heart when they stray.
The mad dogs of man never repent
For they have no sense of shame or sorrow.
Worshiping dominance and the dark side of life
Abusing victims as if there were no tomorrow.
God gives us the will to sin no more
And to overcome evil unwilling to cease.
The mad dogs of man must be stopped
Who murder, rape and destroy world peace.
Samson, Solomon, Moses and David
Were chosen by God to stand tall.
They faced great odds and the fear of death
Refusing to ignore their call.
The time has come for the people of Earth
To band together to restrain the horde.
Standing firm against tyranny where it exists
Putting the mad dogs of man to the sword.
By Kansas City Poet Tom Zart
Google = Most Published Poet
Tom’s 1,650 Poems Are Free To Share!
Google = George Bush Tom Zart
Google = Most Published Poet YouTube
Google = Love War & More
Goodluck.ukrain
lies! CNN is commie china and russia puppet! Ukraine is winning! What is this clown talking about?
Enough help , if you live in a bad neighborhood you arm yourself and step up security, WDF you want the world to take care of you when you were spending money on stupid shit living next to Russia. How did a comedian become your leader and so rich in a short time.
Ukrainian troops are fleeing from Lisichank, leaving "javelins" in the trenches.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spv_pOPMOo4
No longer will Russia bully anyone.
Russia is great power & real Super power. Mess with Russia is foolish. Ukraine has under estimated Russian power. Results of Russia v/s Ukraine war is horrible. Innocent human are being killed. Anti Russian powers are fingering puppet zelensky to mess with Russia. They r monsters
Prepare this is the long one but interesting I promise you! It will be interesting for politicians, the military, scientists, and civilians around the globe. These facts you either forget or don't knew about:
Do you remember how WW1 has begun? There's no one wanted to fight in WW1. Why? Because all that ignite the conflict were the incidents and clashes between Serbia and Austria-Hungary.
But the Russian Empire was for the Serbian and Germany for the Austria-Hungary. And once Russia supported Serbs and Germany Austria.
Bang, WW1 has begun by luring all other countries into the war. Yet no one wanted war, right? Results? Casualties estimate something around 20 million deaths and 21 million wounded.
Wait a minute. What if someone had the nuclear warhead? How many people were dead in a case of the nuclear war back then? It's hard to estimate.
Read on, I'm just at the beginning. WW2 was the second-largest war of the 20's century. Again, no one wanted the war. But basically, WW2 was the continuing of WW1 – because some German folks and specifically Hitler and rich people wanted a rematch. Now Hitler attacked Europe and lure the countries into the war.
From 1939 till 1945, heavy casualties 85 million approximately by the end of 1945. But no one wanted the war, right? What if someone had the warhead back in the times of WW2? I think casualties would be significantly…significantly much more…
Who knows about Cuban Missile Crysis? That was from 1962? Do you know that we were on the edge of the nuclear conflict? And the David Rockefeller was forced to travel to the Soviet Union to negotiate. He said back then: "We're on the edge of the thermo-nuclear conflict.
One mistake and neither Soviet, nor United States, and the entire world will be any more". The matter was setteled But listen back then there were only 2 nuclear powers in the world. And today we have 9 countries if I'm not mistaken. Right?
Remember that during the Cuban Missile Crisis – David Rockefeller traveled to the Soviet Union to negotiate before anything bad happened. He strived for the zero chance on the "preventive strikes" because he was smart enough to understand the consequences" And every smart man or woman must understand that fact.
And afterward, when Robert McNamara (United States Secretary of Defense, serving from 1961 to 1968 under Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson) was asked about what prevented the nuclear conflict between US and USSR, he respond: "the luck".
Both the Americans and Soviets were sobered by the Cuban Missile Crisis. The following year, a direct “hot line” communication link was installed between Washington and Moscow to help defuse similar situations, and the superpowers signed two treaties related to nuclear weapons.
Plus we had two nuclear treaties: The SALT I Treaty, which was signed in May 1972, produced an agreement on two significant documents. These were the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM Treaty) and the Interim Agreement on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms.
Well, today we have the "luck" divided by 7 (nuclear countries in addition to the US and Russia) chances for the starting of the last conflict of this civilization. (Casualties in the case? Well, one – everyone on the Earth) I wonder who wants to play this game?
Now today, we have Ukraine and Russia clashes… No one wants the war, right? And nearly all countries are involved indirectly, just like in WW1 and WW2. But let me tell you the difference. In WW1 and WW2 there were no nukes by the end of the war (The only US in 1945).
And today we have heavily armed countries with nukes that according to the SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institut), nuclear powers are planning to expand and modernize their nuclear capacities.
https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2022/global-nuclear-arsenals-are-expected-grow-states-continue-modernize-new-sipri-yearbook-out-now
Expanding nuclear arsenals during the conflicts is increase the chance of such a conflict by the order of the magnitude!!!
What to do? Here what was done and pretty much successfully:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_disarmament
Here, visit this link to know almost all cases of the start of the accidental cases that could trigger the nuclear war.
It's important to know to every politician, military, or authority:
https://futureoflife.org/background/nuclear-close-calls-a-timeline/ (Every politician, official, military, rich or poor must know it. Or at least read one time and notice the crucial facts!)
And lastly: preventive nuclear strike… What's the hell does that mean? If you watched the examples listed above, you'll see that "preventive nuclear strike must've been in all of the cases. But they don't. And humanity was safe. If something happened it's required of investigated, not the response!
One person has no right to decide whether to start a nuclear war or not! That was the case with (President Richard M. Nixon that was clinically depressed, emotionally unstable, and drinking heavily. Thus U.S. Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger instructed the Joint Chiefs of Staff to route “any emergency order coming from the president”—such as a nuclear launch order— through him first (Schlosser 2013, p. 360).”
Now I urge everyone, whether you a high-authority, military or civilian. Don't make a decision of such a "preventive strike" ever. Because you'll launch the "extermination of humanity".
Believe me (or to scientists), every preventive strike will be punished by… God… I don't know. Somehow scientists think, know, and believe that the nuclear strike, even a warning shot (passing of the nuclear threshold), leads to the "extermination… mutual… of the brothers and sisters of the Earth…
Both rich and poor have their kids. I think they want to see their children's children playing around, walking to the high school, marriage, work, and so on and so forth.
Thus I'm asking them: What's the point to be rich when there's no option to live? Why have power, when you can't use it? Why have authority that there's nothing relevant in it?
For those who survive the blast, there're mutations are waiting that no one hasn't seen… That's how the human cell reacts to the high level of radiation… mutations…
What to do? It's so simple I don't get why they're waiting for: Immediate meeting of (G8) nations at the table in the United Nations Office.
Democracy has to be protected through a clear assumption that guessing or assuming whether to make the preventive nuclear strikes on some mythical threat is folly. And the 100% guarantee of the start of the non-mythical but the real nuclear exchange. Here's what also the US scientists think about the subject:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219169/ (Every politician, official, military, rich or poor must know it. Or at least read one time and notice the crucial facts!)
I will tell you the effects of what will not happen: If VIP people think they can rely on policies from the previous centries, that's just faulty assumptions of the reality.
Because back then, centuries ago, until 1945 of course, you could stop the war through ambassadors or ceasing fire. Please tell me: How you can cease-fire in a case of a nuclear war? How do you know that the time for a cease-fire is coming or coming?
You can't tell the warhead that flying: "Hey, can you fly slower? We're cease-firing here…"
I always thought that approach when you have such a powerful weapon must be scientific, not the lay-people approach and gambling.
The days of the World Wars are over…Just think about it – one more time… and humanity will be exterminated… The last consequences of the civilization… Why risk or even add 1 inch or 0,0001% of the possibilities?
I wanted to end with the quote from Henry Kissinger: "There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full". I wish you all people a great life no matter where you live or what you're doing! A possible way to solve the problem through the referendum:
https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1088 (How the referendum settles the international problems!)
I really want to shake hands with each one of you who read or has not even read this. Because I feel the part of humanity that requires protection today.
Let's unite as countries of the united humanity and treat each other on the base of the law of justice and mutual assistance. I wish you well, no matter where you're living. Because you're still my brother or sister and I am ready to defend your children if there's a danger for them! That's why I keep writing this so everyone read it! I say it from the deep of my heart!
Please re-post it, please! It takes some time to write such long monologues 🙂
Ground reports indicate these are prone to repaores and not robust as Russian gu s.
Black Sheep
Did it hit the target?
Why don't we spent this much on fixing America's crumbling infrastructure??
Top
Bolsonaro o melhor presidente do Brasil e.do mundo inteiro!
This weapon is also used to shell peaceful areas of Donetsk!
For me Lithuania and Poland are nothing more than British conspiratorial pens. Their territories were always pastures for those who wanted to invade Russia.
Expert explains how Lithuania lured NATO into Kaliningrad blockade trap
By worsening relations with Russia because of restrictions on transit to Kaliningrad, Lithuania has lured NATO into a trap, points out expert Emma Ashford to the Foreign Policy issue.
"A question arises as to whether Lithuanians consulted with their European allies in Western Europe before making this decision. I think this is a potential case of the alliance being lured into a trap, where a generally smaller and weaker member manages to lure its ally for a conflict that does not correspond to their interests", pondered Ashford.